[Mr Wook would wish, he says, to thank both the commentors called 'anon' and his old classmate, Ivy Iverson, for their suggestions in response to the first posting of this essay, just previous; the fruits of their kind attention & advice may be seen, here -- ed]
by Bodwyn Wook
More than twenty years after the pulling down of the wall in Berlin, and the end of both the Cold War and late modernity then, these today are the anachronistic, the petty and pampered, political faces of a done for American past that still haunts the World. They are the old Roman blind masks of death and the after the fact crisis now on us, the final crisis, of the old American late modern order. History like a snail in a garden as always leaves its traces. Now, in the digital clatter of a load of mortgaged electronic junk out of Asia, the players writhe and gaze vacantly out their eye holes on the eve of yet an other “government shutdown”. They can not and they will not compose their differences over the spending of “money” that in fact does not exist. They are soaked and slimed in the infantile political hatreds of a childish and useless generation. Now, like stylish and twittering, sub adult, factions in a bad expensive suburban highschool, they peer and squint in the night and fog of the public spot light, in side of the in sides of our Tee Vee sets, to vilify each other and each other’s criminal parties. They do so with every impression of sincerity and give no sign what ever of knowing that the American game of “governance” does not matter any more. None of this can matter any more. For the players them selves in fact do not matter. They are sightless dummies in a bankrupt department store window with out clothes — and so their ticks and megrims can not matter any more. Not now. And, from now for ward, never again. But with no more real sense of the actual time in the World than a cracked and askew sundial leaning under a cloud, or a digital watch with an exhausted battery, they cling on none the less. Their motives and vague purposes are painfully naked for all to see, and a shame to the whole battered and misused population. They hang on for dear life to their old disputes long since discredited by the un deliberately misled and yet endlessly, tirelessly, and always stupidly, lied to (and yet still, as yet even so, still un dead!) “American people”. The root of the stupid dishonesty in it all lies in the way that, and how that just to go on day by day in that manner of all men more or less alive with out any actual religion, they lie to them selves about their service and dedication. This devout capacity for self deceit makes them deceitful, but they are there for fools (perhaps it is a kind of Sufi teaching plot?) and therefore not actual villains. Only careerish half wits hot after prominence in order there by to know to them selves that they “really” live. It is their results that are Evil, and this is no merit of theirs and, so, any thing at all satanic in it is not particularly to their credit. Their political self service is all vanity, and it is no thing but stale haggling over the dismemberment of a corpse. It has no thing on Earth any more what so ever to do with us. For they rave and hiss like vampires in an old literature, drowning in the ocean and who grasp and feud at a waterlogged coffin stuffed with garlic. They have no more purpose than to keep alive some how the old quarrel. It is all they know. For all they know of any way of life beyond their own, it is all there is. That not stylish out dated party fight — we all can vaguely remember this part it, any way, since they all blindly, and only just to get elected, promised us all “free” money — was about which party would get to drink the public blood of an exhausted budget and gorge on a virtually meaningless “dollar”. Like vampires in that old literature of a sleepless doomed careerism, and all the frenzied sleepless days and pointless stealthy nights invested and hence lost for ever in emptiness, these are the false faces twisted and tanned that show us yet again the traces of History’s (as well as of God’s) left behind ones. It is a kind of ambulatory archaeology of un dead things that have the shapes and make the noises of men with warm blood. It has about it all that semblance of “World” significance so dear globally to worldly none entity. There is in it all an under current livid and rococco, of the paedophiliac viagresque and the grotesque. They are political men with no dignity of self control, and with no other “power” at all in the Earth except in sulks and incooperation, and they are a bad dull sort of closing joke on the end of the constitutional age in History. Mainly they over identify them selves with the passing moodinesses and other hypostases of their distinctly over active and not witting inner womanliness. It is their profound ignorance of any thing what so ever about their own selves beyond what appears in the mirror and passing store windows through gritty limousine plate glass, and in side of the in sides of our Tee Vee sets, that makes them hysterical. They are so many Jane Fondas and Ann Coulters in three piece suits with two pairs of pants. More than any other single thing they are the sad indictment above all of whom ever were so luckless as to have been assigned by the Synarchs of the Institute to try to be their teachers. They have been brought down, as always, by the convergence of foolish egotism and no knowledge what so ever at all of History.
[Bodwyn Wook
[all rights reserved
[10 April 2011]
See how nice that is! Your “The root of the stupid dishonesty in it all lies in the way that, and how that just to go on day by day in that manner of all men more or less alive with out any actual religion…” is vernacular (…in the way that, and how that just to ((verb)…)), but it works perfectly here. The trouble is that good writing needs lots of good reading, by readers. _You_ can’t overcome that lack with footnotes! So in this case if no one has read Dracula, of course they can’t be expected to get it. “They are so many Jane Fondas and Ann Coulters in three piece suits with two pairs of pants” is ironic and satirical, using as you do the outdated sexist (sic) language of a previous generation. Its wit is in the _extension_; this gives the younger reader (those who are well-read, I mean) time as it clangs with our parents’ line about “she wears the pants in that family”. By this overdrawing, you give the reader just an additional saving moment to make aware the half-remembered association.
Hyphens are meant for clarity of expression. I just thought of a (probably not good) example: if you write “Twenty Mule Team Borax,” are you referring a a team of twenty mules, or twenty mule teams? This problem is cleared up by the use of a hyphen: “Twenty-mule Team Borax.” I think the brand name was actually without the hyphen, but I guess that’s just commercial writing, which is not noted for its grammatical rigor.
I didn’t know what to call them until you supplied the term: separated agglutinatives. This is probably the most common type of error in present-day writing, more so even than the misuse of the apostrophe, or the inability to properly use colons and semicolons. I suspect a lot of people might write “semi colons…” I really have no idea where this came from, because it seems to me that the trend was, until perhaps the 1980s or so, toward separated words becoming hyphenated, and hyphenated words becoming single words. I first took note of this sometime (not “some time”) within the last ten years on the internet.
Thanks, Iverson, as you can see, Navarth (the Mad Poet) doesn’t agree with you on nuance and subtlety and prefers the obvious and overt.
I meant that I _liked_ the “separated agglutinatives”, that they helped to create some _stumbling_ for the reader, a pause caused by being tripped, that makes them fight a little harder, just to “make” the text mean something. Especially what their previous life has made them think it “should”. Only now can the vanity of both writer and reader be actually worth something, because _finally_ it costs something! Maybe it is just being made to fight for the reader’s pre-existing standpoint. And that’s irritating, of course it is. The trick is to catch yourself in your automatic response when what is, after all, simply another prejudice (a judgement or assumption made beforehand without thinking!) is at work. Even so, it is better to be irritated while reading and to have to say “this IS what I believe!”– _then_ you can finally reclaim consciously at last your preconceptions! That way you are morally responsible in a way that you couldn’t possibly be when it was all automatic. Otherwise, it is just some doctor banging on you with a little knee hammer, you spazzing and everybody going: “THAT’S normal!” Until you deal with the really difficult texts without going beyond questioning the author’s motives, it’s just slogan versus slogan.
Or Spy vs Spy, like in the old Mad cartoon!
Only those rigid & tragic, epimethean & blinkered, suppressed, personalities, the victims of public ‘education’ who first memorised these ‘eternal’ and indeed arbitrary, tyrannous, ‘absolute’ ‘rules’ of syntax & prosody in the grammar school & to the stroke of the clanging bell, will fully at all costs sacrifice every thing & at all times to an hysterical & (it is all together!) a factitious ‘clarity’; when what most earnestly is to be restored to so-called ‘objective’ discourse is, precisely, that allusive & associative & parallel strand in narrative: by which, alone, we may hope at all for some sort of restoration of the indispensable tertium, alone the SQN of all free & imaginal and, hence, saving perception.
In short, ‘a grin on a grammarian’s face like a cat eating shit’ will do; and, no hyphens needed — not for Dear Ambiguity’s sake, amin.
The separation of agglutinatives can be in most like wise a most use full tool in like wise, all so, in restoring the too-long & viciously-suppressed /associative/ function; this is of the essence to any fully functional literature, QED.
al-Wuq ‘abd al-Kilmat
You know, the thing that puzzles me most is to understand how a poet could paradoxically be so stuck in the literal. I mean, what is the point when such murderous clarity of expression in fact obliterates the motion of the soul? It’s actually against life! That is, it amounts to carrying ruthlessness beyond any thing — smile, Emmett! — at all necessary in service of the truth. Why, even “the truth” would shrivel up and die in such a blast furnace. Only the worst sort of lies can hope to exist where any thing — grin! — at all _subtle_ is paved over and cemented under with fascist rules.
Maybe it’s all part of some sort of put on?
I mean, madness (as in “the Mad Poet”) is not particularly compatible with this kind of poison, that’s just a stereotype. As though all who are mad are at the same time nihilists, and the sworn enemy of beauty. All the same, it’s quite a trick to make something beautiful out of an enforced common grammar. If so, then that’s the genius in it!
Emmett, “the Mad Poet”, did _you_ make that up? (See, I do remember your tall stories!)
Mr Wook says thank you to everyone…every one…for your interest in his stylish experimentation with the hyphen-less page. And, I do too, as I’ve a person in mind who well may now decide NOT to have me tutor her boyfriend in politics!
Yoo-hoo! They just got Osama, plus Obama announced that he IS American. So there.
Osama, Obama…Yo Mama!
I suppose that in wake of last week’s successful passing off of forged birth certificates (you bet they had to search Hell to find some 1970 IBM Selectric typewriter balls — remember those? — and printer’s ink still in tubes from back then, and plus some way old legal-type manila or other certificate-bond!), the other bureaucracies got their overfunded asses into a competitive snit and, so, produced /this/ fairytale. Of course, a pinch will get you a pound that the “body” they say that they threw out of the helicopter into the sea was one of la Cheney’s old Luv Dolls, all got up in a burnoose and beslathered in olive oil for that real genuine imitation dark and swarthy “semitic look”.
The dark side of security-careerism….
We chased this courier since when? And pissed away how much dough? To find out where? Whereas Huffington reports that any asshole on the face of the Earth can simply do the Google map-thing, type in “Osama’s compound” — and there it all is, bigger than shit. Oh, well, even allowing for the fact the President is just as much lied to by his bureaucracy as all the rest of us, you have got to give him, personally, credit. If only for the fact the fact that he, himself, is a real adult. Unlike the other two Baby Boom bedwetter Presidents so far before him.
President Obama really let these Tea Party kiddie-porn potbellies have it good, when he hauled off at the Press Club at the weekend and said to Congresswench Michele Bachmann:
“What ho, Congresswoman Bachmann, I hear YOU was born in Canada.”
When she visibly winced and spurted pee in her drawers, the President lowered the boom:
“See…THAT’S how these rumors get started!”
Personally, I expect that the Obama birth certificate is OK and that it is on the level. And, so what if it ain’t? In view of all of the OTHER BS going around, that just puts any possible “forgery” right smack dab on all fours with Leo Strauss, the “noble lie” and all the rest of that NeoCon old shit. Anyway — unlike these ditto NeoCon shitasses — the President isn’t hysterical, and he is definitely more of a grownup than any of these idiots deserve to have for their President. I also expect that they probably did “do” Osama, but can’t help wishing that it’s just another lie, too, as that is all that a whole lot of these dumb bastards deserve in the first place.
Only that would be the final insult to the families of all the people killed, in the last analysis by all the careerist and incoordinate and stupid “intelligence” agencies in the first place.
What a collection, religious crackpots on the one hand and a bunch of perverts on the other.
What a choice.
It is pretty shitty. At least when our grandparents were in power in 1933 and 1941 they cooked a real World War. All our folks could manage, later, was the Cold War and Vietnam fiasco. And, now, us, this.
Oh, well, I guess if we’d been around and looking at the show back in 1940 or whatever, then we’d have seen for ourselves just what a lot of absolute God-damn fools some of the Roosevelt bunch were, too.
Osama, Bush, Obama for that matter, all have these “Important Personalities” — this is a pain in the ass for EVERYBODY else, and this psychological craving to get in the way and be /noticed/ by God & everybody is the cause of all the History and other bullshit.
It is not a triumph, it is another downhill lurch. They simply killed someone they should have caught, above all for _real_ security and intelligence purposes.
I suppose that Osama would have said just a little too much, about just a few too many.
Also, by claiming that they got the tipoff from some Gitmo inmate, that justifies the whole extralegal torture business.
Essentially, like you said in your email, it was a gangsta smackdown of some guy like Noriega that they first bought, then sold and who wouldn’t stay bought and sold.
Not really. It just doesn’t progress the New Age, but then that would be pearls before swine (ha!) anyway. I mean hauling Osama in and putting him on trial and then frying his ass. The Republicans would just bitch about the international criminal court idea, and Obama sure as fuck does NOT want to add to the Gitmo bullshit about the legitimacy of military tribunals or any other kangaroo courts. So he had the fucker shot. Case closed. Plus it just puts a BIG board way sideways WAY up the neo-con asshole:
Your Bush pubus isn’t the only wild man in town, screw you.
I expect that when The Assholes get over their shock and start hauling out the splinters, they will start to piss all over themselves about how Obama “should have” put Pretty Baby in Gitmo. Well, screw them. Obama knows the whole fucking terror war is completely fucked up, and he can’t do a thing about the bureaucracy. But, man, he can kill people too!
Like Wook says, “it’s just history…yawn!”
The shit is now so deep that they’ve said it’s all “classified” and quit with the any more explanations shtik.
How fortunate we are to have Fox television news to clear up the misconceptions existing out there in the misinformed public.
Just this morning we learn that when the Navy Seals burst into Bin Ladin’s room, he DID NOT hide behind a woman…NO Sir…” he hurled one of his wives at them ”
We owe Fox thanks for giving us the truth, “fair and balanced”:
“‘Cause, Clyde, if your talkin’ down my country, hoss, you’re walkin’ on the fightin’ side of me”, Merle Haggard
Ha! Practical, MDPIC tells me that the SEAL team leader has a degree in (ta, da!) journalism, so he’s ANOTHER (you guessed it!) spin doctor.
You know, Jesse Ventura, the oldtime MN governor and onetime Navy SEAL, had a really shitty relationship with the press. This always bothered me because, of course, Ventura was — and, is! — such a showman. Naturally, it all went to Hell for him when he went into politcs — because he wanted to move to a higher level.
The inksters all just howled and actually wouldn’t let him!
(I think of course that they should have been more manipulable than that, they just are…but Ventura got a little too high-up for his own good. Even though he should have known better, he graduated two years after me from Rosey Tech, where we had by then an insolent underground student newspaper!)
The SEALS evidently have taken this all on board and, nowadays, are just bound and determined to control the whole thing from the git-go.
There are reasons I don’t watch television anymore, and Faux is one of them.
Gosh, Ivy…I just popped in after weeks for a look-see. I hope that Wook doesn’t get a swelled head. You sure make it all sound like he’s pulled off something (some thing!) ‘rather clever’. (As my Pop used to say, in single inverted commas.)
[Mr. Wook on 21 June 2011 (OS) having made Institute 64th, this posting is now made to inform readers that in future, and at the request of Institute syndics, the gentleman shall be appearing only infrequently in these online pp -- ed]